Unlike family members, no one is born with friends. Having good friends is important, and it would be impossible to get through life without them. Though it might seem like the only thing that matters with friends is compatibility and the people themselves, there are many outside factors that make friendship one of the most complicated relationships in life. Most friendships can be organized into three basic categories. Friends by environment, friends by chance, and friends by fate. Friends by environment are friends that you make because of being in close proximity to them (for example, friends that you make
on a sports team or other after-school activity). Friends by chance are friends that you make purely by coincidence, such as meeting someone on an airplane flight or bumping into them on the street. Friends by fate are people that make it seem like it would be impossible not to be friends with them. These are friends that you always want to be with and that you “click with.” These categories are not clear-cut, and there can be a lot of overlap between them. “Recitatif”, “Roman Fever,” and “This is What it Means to Say Phoenix, Arizona,” all feature different kinds of these relationships and offer insight into what defines our friendships.
“Recitatif” by Toni Morrison is an example of a chance friendship. Two girls meet briefly at an orphanage, become close friends, and then disappear from each other’s lives. “Recitatif” explores the barriers that a white girl and black girl experience in their relationship. Even the beginning of their relationship was strained by their difference in race and Morrison suggests that Twyla and Roberta only became friends because they were put in the same room. The friendship that they developed was strong and had lasting impacts on their lives. However, in the few encounters, they have later in life, it is clear that their relationship has changed and that there are newly introduced problems. Morrison writes, “There was this silence that came down right after I laughed. A silence it was her turn to fill up…I was dismissed without anyone saying goodbye, so I thought I would do it for her” (239). Friends by chance have the potential to become very close since there is usually an event or experience tying them together, but are also volatile as they are susceptible to outside factors. The environment that the story takes place in works against their relationship. The social barriers between Twyla and Roberta become more prevalent as the story progresses, breaking their friendship apart. Despite the more fragile nature of friends by chance, these types of relationships can also create bonds that would not normally be possible. Twyla and Roberta should have been best friends, but environmental circumstances took them apart even though chance brought them together.
“Roman Fever” exemplifies friends by environment. Ms. Ansley and Ms. Slade clearly have never really liked each other, and are “friends” only because they were raised in similar backgrounds. They are both upper-class women and lead similar lives. They both have one daughter, rich husbands, and even live near each other. However, Wharton writes, “Like many intimate friends, the two ladies had never before had occasion to be silent together, and Mrs. Ansley was slightly embarrassed by what seemed, after so many years, a new stage in their intimacy” (301). Ms. Ansley and Ms. Slade have a long history together, but they only act cordially towards each other. Both hide secrets from the other in order to avoid conflict, and it takes several decades for them to finally talk about the resentments they have. If the environment is what brings two people together, it will be hard for them to separate even if they should since the circumstances will not have changed (compared to chance where circumstances can change easily). In the case of “Roman Fever,” Ms. Slade confronting Ms. Ansley could have had social repercussions depending on how other people in their social circle viewed the situation. Moreover, if Ms. Ansley had told Ms. Slade that her fiance was having an affair with her, she would have been ostracized. Wharton shows the reader how tensions can build up over many years and how friendships can still deteriorate without any visible signs. Though friends by environment are likely the most common and easy friends to have, these relationships have the most potential for grudges and toxic relationships to develop.
“This is What it Means to Say Phoenix, Arizona” is an example of friends by fate. Victor and Thomas are close friends when they are young. They do everything together and they even share dreams together. Though they seem inseparable, Victor and Thomas still grow apart over time. Like “Recitatif,” this short story is another example of how environment can break relationships even if two people share a close bond. However, friends by fate will always share a connection no matter how long it has been or what has happened between the two people. Though they do not become friends again, they find closure during their trip to Phoenix. They acknowledge their differences as well as the memories that they have together. Thomas helps Victor deal with his father’s death, and the two of them fulfill their childhood dreams of becoming warriors and leaving the reservation to some extent. “This is What it Means to Say Phoenix, Arizona” shows how even friends that are destined to be together, often do not end up together because of things that they cannot control.
Friends can be tied together for many different reasons. Friendships often are not logical and can happen or end for no apparent reason. Friends by chance are held together by a shared experience, friends by environment are held together by external circumstances, and friends by fate are held together by a deep connection that just feels right. These three categories are not mutually exclusive, and it would be possible to have a friend that falls into all three. “Recitatif”, “Roman Fever,” and “This is What it Means to Say Phoenix, Arizona,” give us examples of how different factors can cause relationships to fall apart or come together and make the argument that there does not have to be a certain environment or reason to foster friendship.
Your post did a nice job of exploring the difference between three different types of friendships that appeared in some of the short stories we read. I hadn’t really ever thought about the way I’ve met my friends before, but after reading your post it’s easy to think of people in my life that fall into each category. Your analysis of each story that had a different type of friendship was really interesting to read to see similarities and differences between stories that were all part of the same unit on frenemies. Great post!
ReplyDeleteThis post compares all the different types of friendships and how they play out in their respective stories very well. It's easy to understand a type of friendship within its own story, but trying to compare them to each other is a lot more complicated, but you handled that very well. I specifically like how you characterized Victor and Thomas's "relationship by fate" as being broken up by the environment. It's interesting how these same situations that bring people together can also break people apart and turn the characters into "frenemies" in very different ways.
ReplyDeleteI think you chose a great question to help analyze these three stories! I like how you organized the friendships by how they were formed and how they broke, as that is typically the focus in all these stories. In pretty much all three, we see two friends (who are no longer really friends) looking back on or in some way traveling through their past and the history of their friendship, and specifically how it effected their present lives. Noting the significance of how each friendship formed is really important for understanding the stories, like for example, in "Roman Fever", the two women were only really friends because of their similar environments, which in a way caused a fake (backstabby) relationship.
ReplyDeleteI thoroughly enjoyed your breakdown of each of the friendships we've seen this semester. The frenemies trope is a fun but complex one to study, and very bittersweet. I think each of these stories ended with the same uncomfortably comfortable... or comfortably uncomfortable relationship dynamic. I'm not quite sure which one it is. Also, it's always fun to see how my friendships align with the ones you mentioned here:')
ReplyDeleteGreat post! Although the three stories you discussed all revolve around the friendship of two characters, you did a great job analyzing how different these friendships are from each other. I like that you classified the friendships based on how they began and how they ended, as although the complexities of each one makes them hard to compare to each other, all three stories focus on how the friendships eventually collapsed. I also noticed that while the friendship in "Recitatif" ended due to environmental circumstances and the friendship in "Roman Fever" ended due to the friends actually hating each other, the friendship between Victor and Thomas seemed to be a combination of the two.
ReplyDeleteNice, well done. I wasn't familiar with these three different concepts of friendships, and I really liked how you broke down each one and connected them to a story that we read. I initially questioned your assessment of Thomas and Victor as "friends by fate" - how could that be so if they grew apart? - but you did a great job analyzing this and showing that it is certainly possible. I also like the conclusion this leads to: that friends by fate, while they can be separated, will always remain connected, while other friendships can wax and wane.
ReplyDeleteI really liked the way you formatted your post. Giving specific examples of each kind of friendship using multiple stories gave a clear image of what you were talking about. As soon as I was reading your introduction “This is What it Means to Say Phoenix, Arizona” came to mind, and I think it is a very good example of the idea of "friends by fate" like you pointed out. To me, all the stories we read had an unsatisfying end, and I think that is because of the drifting and uncertainty in friendship you outlined.
ReplyDelete